Working In These Times

Monday Aug 23, 2010 1:39 pm

Putting SEIU’s Bipartisan Political Spending In Context

By Lindsay Beyerstein

Then-Alaska governor Sarah Palin speaks at the Republican Governors Association conference in November 2008, as Texas Governor Rick Perry looks on.   (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Republican members, political bet hedging drive union's donations to GOP governors' association 

Last week, we reported that the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) has been donating between $50,000 and $100,000 annually to the Republican Governors' Association (RGA) for the past several years.

This came as a surprise to many, because SEIU has become so closely associated with Democratic party politics. Of course, there's no doubt that SEIU is a major force in Democratic politics. At the national level, SEIU reliably gives over 90% of its federal campaign dollars to Democratic candidates. Individual locals have their own political budgets that aren't tracked by the national SEIU.

SEIU's budget for the 2010 election year is $44 million, up from $35 million in 2006, according to Jon Youngdahl, SEIU's national political director. That's the money that the national union will spend on House and Senate races and statewide races such as gubernatorial races. The political budget includes not only contributions to campaigns but also programs to educate members about politics and encourage them to get involved.

Youngdahl said the union's top priority for this election is getting its members engaged. SEIU has various programs to reach out to members on the job and at home. The union also sponsors a "Walk a Day in My Shoes" program where political candidates spend a day doing the job of a SEIU member. In Pennsylvania, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Dan Onorato is scheduled to do a walk-through later this week at a nursing facility in Philadelphia.

All told, SEIU and its affiliated state and local councils will spend a combined total of $20-$30 million to elect Democratic governors in 2010.

The lion's share of SEIU's political budget comes from voluntary member contributions, not union dues. About 300,000 SEIU members give an average of $7 a month to SEIU's Committee on Political Education (COPE). According to Michelle Ringuette, SEIU's director of strategic affairs, at least 300,000 of SEIU's 2 million members are Republicans. Therefore, she said, SEIU feels a responsibility to take the political leanings of these members into consideration when allocating its contributions.

"Our members - Democratic, Republican, Green, Independent and whatever - want and need to talk to their governors and other elected representatives," Ringuette explained, "Our members also drive much of the decision-making about how we spend their voluntary contributions to COPE."

Realistically, a certain percentage of governors will be Republicans and SEIU will inevitably find itself negotiating with them, since many of SEIU's members work for state governments. Giving to the RGA can be seen as an attempt to hedge SEIU's bets.

Youngdahl said that the union's contributions to the RGA are partly an attempt to build goodwill at the state level. He denied that the contributions had anything to do with the RGA's high-profile campaign to influence state legislators when they redraw electoral boundaries in 2011.

3 comments  · 

Comments

Bruce Vail 24 Aug 2010
7:37 am

Sorry, Lisa, but this post is uninformative, if not dishonest.

I don’t think any union makes a $100,000 campaign contribution without a specific goal in mind.

In the past, I worked for a union that made regular contribution to anti-union Republican candidates, but the reason was that those Republicans supported very specific legislative proposals or programs that were favored by the union. It was definitely a “politics makes strange bedfellows” situation, but there was a very real, very pragmatic rationale behind it.

My guess is that the SEIU is doing something similar.

Lindsay Beyerstein 24 Aug 2010
7:55 am

That’s Lindsay, not Lisa.

Dishonest on my part?

I asked several SEIU officials, I pressed them repeatedly, and that’s what they told me. SEIU has been giving to the RGA for years, about $100,000 a year, give or take. That pattern makes me agree with you that there’s a very real, pragmatic rationale, but that it’s not necessarily one specific project. Sometimes there’s a generic price of admission.

I tend to believe them when they say that the objective isn’t to influence redistricting because i) they give about the same amount when redistricting isn’t coming up; ii) $100,000 isn’t nearly enough to influence the RGA on such a big issue.

If anyone has any alternative theories, let’s hear them.

Bruce Vail 24 Aug 2010
8:24 am

Sorry, Lindsay….I was not suggesting that your reporting was dishonest at all.

What I should have said is that I suspect your SEIU contacts were either uninformed, or were less-than-honest with you.

It is well understood that groups like the RGA (and its Democratic Party counterparts) are an exploitation of loopholes in the campaign finance laws that allow campaign givers to launder contributions to favored candidates. For example, if a union has maxed out it’s legal contributions to a candidate under state law, then additional money can be funneled to the candidate through the RGA.

Although sleazy, this is the way business is done when it come to campaign finance.

Please Login to Comment register a new account »

To participate in discussions, please register an account.

retrieve lost password »