Views » August 3, 2016
An Inside-Outside Strategy For the Political Revolution
Raucous protests and down-ballot Democrats can beat the Bernie-or-bust blues.
So what if Bernie’s most fervent supporters disrupted the convention proceedings? A vibrant and healthy political culture is by definition messy.
After a long intra-party campaign, your side—bucking the odds, and facing a hostile media and party apparatus—does extraordinarily well. Your movement encourages millions of Americans to question the assumptions of the neoliberal elite. Yet, in the end, your candidate loses. What do you do?
If you are one of the “Bernie or Bust” delegates at the Democratic convention—a convention to which you have been democratically elected to support Sanders—you march out of the convention arena chanting, without a shred of irony: “This is what democracy looks like!”
If the Sanders movement is premised on an “inside/outside” game, aren’t the elected delegates the people who are meant to work on the inside? It is easy to agree with Sarah Silverman when, from the convention podium, she scolded: “To the Bernie or Bust people: You’re being ridiculous.”
But not so fast. The Bernie or Bust contingent comes from the tradition of Occupy Wall Street, not Democratic Party politics. Their tactics are bound to rub some people the wrong way. Recall Occupy Wall Street—with its fetish for horizontality and its endlessly deliberative meetings that excluded people with families and jobs. It was a movement that frustrated many traditional progressives.
Yet, it bears remembering that it was Occupy Wall Street that made the 99% and the 1% part of the world’s political lexicon, not the hidebound American Left. Similarly, the enthusiasm and hard work of the Occupy Wall Street generation catapulted Bernie Sanders within grasping distance of the Democratic Party nomination. So what if Bernie’s most fervent supporters disrupted the convention proceedings? A vibrant and healthy political culture is by definition messy. Get over it. That slight to political decorum is nothing compared to Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s gross violation of the Democratic National Committee bylaws.
Clinton clinched the nomination, but the political revolution will continue in the guise of what the Sanders campaign is branding “Our Revolution.” Under that inclusive banner, the campaign will deploy resources to more than 100 candidates running for public office this fall.
“If we are successful, what it will mean is that the progressive message and the issues that I campaigned on will be increasingly spread throughout this country,” Sanders told USA Today, explaining that Our Revolution will encourage grassroots activists “to get involved, give them the tools they need to win, [and] help them financially.”
To nurture the grassroots, Our Revolution will pursue a 50-state strategy, beginning with a challenge to the Democratic Party leadership in many of the states that Bernie carried in the primaries and caucuses. Democratic establishment be warned: Expect Sanders’ supporters to run in party precinct elections from Vermont to Hawaii.
Since its founding 40 years ago, In These Times has advocated an inside/outside strategy vis-à-vis electoral politics. On the outside, we raise Cain, agitate, and describe the contours of a just and more democratic future. On the inside, we promote meaningful change within the existing dominant institutions. The inside game inevitably involves joining forces with people with whom we do not always agree. The alternative to pursuing such a strategy is to cede control of the public sphere to the rich and the powerful.
What do you want to see from our coverage of the 2020 presidential candidates?
As our editorial team finalizes plans for our coverage of the 2020 Democratic primary, we want to hear from you:
It only takes a minute to answer this short, three-question survey, but your input will help shape our coverage in the months to come. That’s why we want to make sure you have a chance to share your thoughts.
Joel Bleifuss, a former director of the Peace Studies Program at the University of Missouri-Columbia, is the editor & publisher of In These Times, where he has worked since October 1986.